[126278] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Danny McPherson)
Mon May 10 18:27:36 2010
From: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>
In-Reply-To: <4BE82BAC.2010509@foobar.org>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 16:26:39 -0600
To: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On May 10, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
> this is a matter of risk analysis. No secure routing means we'll continue
> to see the occasional high profile outage which is dealt with very quickly.
If 3 weeks (e.g., the recent 'i root w/China incident) is "very
quickly" then we're operating on different timescales.
> My gut instinct tells me that secure routing and the rpki venture well into
> the realm of negative returns.
I believe 'sucks less' falls into the realm of positive, so here
we disagree.
-danny
