[126277] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Larry Sheldon)
Mon May 10 18:21:17 2010
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 17:20:50 -0500
From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon@cox.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <m2k4rbl8gc.wl%randy@psg.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 5/10/2010 17:04, Randy Bush wrote:
>> Interestingly, the article misses interception and other non-outage
>> potentials due to (sub) prefix hijacking.
>
> you seem to be entering the world of attacks. the AP article's point
> was fat fingers.
Interesting. I took it as a set up of why we NEED a Central Authority.
*shrug* -- We'll see I guess, but probably not in time.
--
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.
Freedom under a constitutional republic is a well armed lamb contesting
the vote.
Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca
ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
