[126006] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (gordon b slater)
Wed Apr 28 03:37:44 2010
X-IP-MAIL-FROM: gordslater@ieee.org
From: gordon b slater <gordslater@ieee.org>
To: Steve Bertrand <steve@ipv6canada.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BD7D1F5.7050804@ipv6canada.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:35:42 +0100
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: gordslater@ieee.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 02:13 -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> > I would see UPNP as being a security risk and prone to denial of
> > service attacks when you have torrent clients attempting to grab
> every
+1
apologies if I've said this here before - UPNP = unstoppable Peek and
Poke
Gord
