[125523] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Hilliard)
Mon Apr 19 10:39:41 2010
X-Envelope-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:39:16 +0200
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
To: Patrick Giagnocavo <patrick@zill.net>
In-Reply-To: <4BCC6553.4060202@zill.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 19/04/2010 16:14, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
> The eyeball ISPs will find it trivial to NAT should they ever need to do
> so [...]
Patrick,
Having made this bold claim, have you ever actually tried to run a natted
eyeball network? The last two natted eyeball networks I worked with could
never figure out which aspect of NAT hurt more: the technical side or the
business side.
Nick
