[125521] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dave Pooser)
Mon Apr 19 10:28:13 2010
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:24:43 -0500
From: Dave Pooser <dave.nanog@alfordmedia.com>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <4BCC6553.4060202@zill.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 4/19/10 9:14 AM, "Patrick Giagnocavo" <patrick@zill.net> wrote:
> The eyeball ISPs will find it trivial to NAT should they ever need to do
> so however, something servers cannot do - you are looking at numbers,
> not operational considerations.
Personally, I'm just waiting to see which eyeball ISP is the first to react
to looming IPv4 exhaustion by (NAT | IPv6 && 6to4)ing their client ranges
and using the freed up /9 to offer colo/hosting services at very competitive
(compared to desperately scrambling to find a /29 at your IPv4-exhausted
ISP) pricing.
--
Dave Pooser, ACSA
Manager of Information Services
Alford Media http://www.alfordmedia.com
