[125093] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cheers to the Communication Committee [was: Likely /8 Scenario -
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Thu Apr 8 18:50:28 2010
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <o2p877585b01004081539p10dfd372i45e9c7cb3b84e2cc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:49:46 -0400
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: Nanog Futures <nanog-futures@merit.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
[Reply-to set.]
On Apr 8, 2010, at 6:39 PM, Michael Dillon wrote:
>> I guarantee you the Communications Committee is on the job. What's =
more, they are doing a GREAT job - for no money and apparently no =
gratitude. It is worse than thankless, no matter what they do they will =
be derided. Filter someone and they get flamed. Leave someone allowed =
to post and they get reamed. I'm shocked anyone would actually want the =
job.
>=20
> So why can't the Communications Committee do a little communicating.
What would you have them say? I am not at all certain commenting =
publicly on individual posters is a good idea. So should they say =
"yeah, we've read the blather too, and we're .. uh .. " what?
Also, the CC is required to at least skim every post. So believe me, =
they know what is happening - more than most since they can't plonk the =
k00ks.
Oh, and feeding the trolls only makes their job harder. Perhaps you =
could pitch in by resisting temptation? Perhaps ALL of you could pitch =
in? :)
--=20
TTFN,
patrick
