[125085] in North American Network Operators' Group
Cheers to the Communication Committee [was: Likely /8 Scenario -
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Thu Apr 8 17:50:19 2010
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <w2s877585b01004081403j71e35337j460e71f64a9cc69d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 17:49:41 -0400
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Apr 8, 2010, at 5:03 PM, Michael Dillon wrote:
> and what makes you think that there is anyone looking after the
> mailing lists any more. There have been few network operational
> threads in recent months, and the Jim Fleming IPv3 bot is given free
> rein on the NANOG lists.
[snip]
I guarantee you the Communications Committee is on the job. What's =
more, they are doing a GREAT job - for no money and apparently no =
gratitude. It is worse than thankless, no matter what they do they will =
be derided. Filter someone and they get flamed. Leave someone allowed =
to post and they get reamed. I'm shocked anyone would actually want the =
job.
So, I propose a new rule: To flame the CC, you MUST have volunteered to =
be on the CC.
IOW: Put up or shut up.
Since I have not volunteered to be on the CC, and would not serve if =
asked, I will only thank them profusely and beg them not to give up amid =
the criticism they constantly receive.
Thank you Communications Committee Members!
--=20
TTFN,
patrick
