[125090] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cheers to the Communication Committee [was: Likely /8 Scenario -
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Dillon)
Thu Apr 8 18:40:32 2010
In-Reply-To: <8F349E33-B6CB-4DD5-9090-0F07869B08C0@ianai.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 23:39:45 +0100
From: Michael Dillon <wavetossed@googlemail.com>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> I guarantee you the Communications Committee is on the job. =A0What's mor=
e, they are doing a GREAT job - for no money and apparently no gratitude. =
=A0It is worse than thankless, no matter what they do they will be derided.=
=A0Filter someone and they get flamed. =A0Leave someone allowed to post an=
d they get reamed. =A0I'm shocked anyone would actually want the job.
So why can't the Communications Committee do a little communicating.
Sure it's thankless work if you do it in secret and in silence. But
the occasional message to the list wouldn't hurt. People WOULD feel
thankful if they see that the CC is making an attempt.
> So, I propose a new rule: To flame the CC, you MUST have volunteered to b=
e on the CC.
Right, so you are an unvolunteer on the CC. Why do we only hear from
unvolunteers?
--Michael Dillon
