[124959] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Finding content in your job title
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Larry Sheldon)
Wed Apr 7 23:00:48 2010
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 22:00:11 -0500
From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon@cox.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <201004072245.o37MjBVS024092@metis.hicks-net.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 4/7/2010 17:45, Gregory Hicks wrote:
> Actually, it doesn't matter how much you make per hour, the deciding
> factor between exempt and non-exempt is how many (if any) people you
> SUPERVISE. No supervision of others, then non-exempt.
I don't think that is correct. "Professionals" do not supervise people
but if the substantial control their own activities and make above a
certain level in total compensation, they may be exempt.
>
> Now you and the employer may agree to some other definition, but that
> is between you and them.
>
> At my previous $DAY_JOB, a technicion who was classified as "exempt"
> took $EMPLOYER to court over back pay, overtime, lunch breaks, et al
> and WON. (He had no direct reports...)
He probably failed the compensation test, or more likely, did not
control his own activities.
--
Democracy: Three wolves and a sheep voting on the dinner menu.
Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca
ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
