[124909] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed Apr 7 12:32:29 2010
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:09:25 +0200."
<4BBC9215.40207@cisco.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:28:39 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, Brandon Ross <bross@pobox.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1270657719_3901P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:09:25 +0200, Eliot Lear said:
> them). If v6 is even close to ready, wouldn't it be sad that this sort
> of testing isn't done at interop?
Interop long ago ceased being a interop shootout and became a 8x11 color glossy
trade show. I think the last time any actual *testing* happened at Interop, the
guys hooking up the network drops were wearing t-shirts that said "Yes, the
subnet mask really *is* 255.255.252.0", and anybody who whined that their gear
only supported octet-boundary subnets was told "And next year, it will be
255.255.250.0".
:)
Anybody got production gear that *still* doesn't do non-octet-boundary subnets?
--==_Exmh_1270657719_3901P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFLvLK3cC3lWbTT17ARAgOxAJ4wcQKhWXAKwOAwPg4LRMImczymoQCgz/d8
wqE3tcl4H8Ed8IPbMNYct1M=
=ZjZy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1270657719_3901P--
