[124479] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: 100% want IPv6 - Was: New Linksys CPE, IPv6 ?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick Giagnocavo)
Wed Mar 31 23:19:41 2010

Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:18:54 -0400
From: Patrick Giagnocavo <patrick@zill.net>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100401031253.GA5032@dan.olp.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Dan White wrote:
> On 31/03/10 22:14 -0300, jim deleskie wrote:
>> I'm a real life user, I know the difference and I could careless about
>> v6.  most anything I want I is on v4 and will still be there long
>> after ( when ever it is) we run out of v4 addresses.  If I'm on a
> 
> From a content perspective, you may be right. Those with a quickly
> dwindling supply of v4 addresses will most likely use what they have left
> for business customers, and for content.
> 
> However, there will be a time when a significant number of
> customers will not be able to access your content.

^^ Uncertainty .

> What percentage of sales are you willing to eat?

^^ Fear .

> 
>> will see the business need, but while I'm expect to have to deploy it
>> for marketing reasons, I hope its someone else's problem but its a
>> must have for real business.
> 
> Are you willing to gamble your business on your expectations? Business
> models will develop that will take advantage of global addressing to end
> devices. The Next Big (Nth) Thing will. Do you feel that you have a perfect
> Crystal Ball, or do you want to start hedging your bets now?

^^ Doubt.


--Patrick


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post