![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:18:54 -0400 From: Patrick Giagnocavo <patrick@zill.net> To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> In-Reply-To: <20100401031253.GA5032@dan.olp.net> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org Dan White wrote: > On 31/03/10 22:14 -0300, jim deleskie wrote: >> I'm a real life user, I know the difference and I could careless about >> v6. most anything I want I is on v4 and will still be there long >> after ( when ever it is) we run out of v4 addresses. If I'm on a > > From a content perspective, you may be right. Those with a quickly > dwindling supply of v4 addresses will most likely use what they have left > for business customers, and for content. > > However, there will be a time when a significant number of > customers will not be able to access your content. ^^ Uncertainty . > What percentage of sales are you willing to eat? ^^ Fear . > >> will see the business need, but while I'm expect to have to deploy it >> for marketing reasons, I hope its someone else's problem but its a >> must have for real business. > > Are you willing to gamble your business on your expectations? Business > models will develop that will take advantage of global addressing to end > devices. The Next Big (Nth) Thing will. Do you feel that you have a perfect > Crystal Ball, or do you want to start hedging your bets now? ^^ Doubt. --Patrick
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |