[124293] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?"
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Mar 30 04:57:27 2010
To: msokolov@ivan.Harhan.ORG (Michael Sokolov)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:28:40 -0000."
<1003300528.AA08926@ivan.Harhan.ORG>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 04:55:06 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1269939306_3909P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:28:40 -0000, Michael Sokolov said:
> Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net> wrote:
>
> > And, if you are using a 1988 TCP stack on a 4.3 system, you are not
> > likely to ever efficiently utilize a higher speed link
>
> What higher speed link? I'm very happy with 384 kbps symmetric, using
> SDSL as ARPANET replacement. I have designed and built my own SDSL to
> EIA-530 CSU/DSU so I can use a Cisco 2500 router instead of that nasty
> new-fangled Netopia which has (oh horror!) RJ45 Ethernet instead of
> proper AUI. Oh, did I forget to mention that my Ethernet is coaxial?
> To me all that UTP stuff isn't true Ethernet.
I call Poe's Law on this one. Mostly because I can't tell which side this
one is on. ;)
--==_Exmh_1269939306_3909P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFLsbxqcC3lWbTT17ARAuKTAKD2fZUg97+cS5B2x8+ep9zSLdZY6QCfcWpJ
8d0Lqpben4xfu4ehcu2lg3o=
=HM0+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1269939306_3909P--
