[123985] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Using private APNIC range in US
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (gordon b slater)
Fri Mar 19 02:09:37 2010
X-IP-MAIL-FROM: gordslater@ieee.org
From: gordon b slater <gordslater@ieee.org>
To: Daniel Senie <dts@senie.com>
In-Reply-To: <80CC32C4-649A-4214-AD76-FE2F098F9544@senie.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:08:56 +0000
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: gordslater@ieee.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 14:50 -0400, Daniel Senie wrote:
> As you note, debugging this type of thing is often not intuitive, as
> everything appears to work from almost everywhere
I got curious yesterday and set off a couple (very slow {option -T0},
very polite, very restrictive) nmap single port scans of a few lumps of
1.0.0.0/22 yesterday, but couldn't see much out there due to my several
of our ISPs internal boxes.
It looks like chaos-squared out there. I don't envy anyone fathoming
that stuff out for real.
Still, that said, the transition to fully signed roots seems to be going
along without too much breakage (I think/hope!) so maybe only time will
tell how much this latest block release will give trouble longterm.
Gord
--
rockin ze chair mit Davey Graham to Banshee from rackserver-2
