[123984] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NSP-SEC
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Pitcock)
Fri Mar 19 00:30:00 2010
From: William Pitcock <nenolod@systeminplace.net>
To: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <4629B58D-22D5-42C8-83CB-6504DD106802@ianai.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:27:15 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 23:52 -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2010, at 11:46 PM, William Pitcock wrote:
>
> > Few people actually care about nsp-sec so what exactly are you getting at?
>
> I might argue the "few" comment, but I think it's better not to reply to Guillaume so people who are smart enough to not see his posts (which would be quite a bit more than a "few") will not be force to see them.
I would say that, in general, more people care about NANOG than
nsp-security, although nsp-security is a worthwhile resource for those
who are dealing with backbone-level problems (which is a minority of the
people on NANOG, who generally are managing single
typically-not-multihomed sites for the most part).
>
> Although I have to admit I am impressed at how quickly he has managed to piss off, alienate, and pretty much guarantee lasting animosity from, well, pretty much every significant person on the 'Net. Perhaps we should lump Guillaume in with $HE_WHO_MUST_NOT_BE_NAMED[*]?
Ugh, that IADL guy. I blackholed his entire IP block at edge because I
got tired of receiving his crap. :D
And yeah, I'm surprised Guillaume can actually post here still.
William
