|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
In-Reply-To: <71bfd60c1003110954v2dcb4f6awdca72690f559d315@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:05:09 -0500 From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> To: trejrco@gmail.com Cc: nanog@nanog.org Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:54 PM, TJ <trejrco@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Chris Woodfield <rekoil@semihuman.com>wrote: > >> To pile on in the spirit of "if people don't complain, nothing will change" >> - is VZB still insisting on filtering >/32 at their peers? While ARIN is >> allocating /40s and /48s directly? >> > > I believe so ... will be even more impactful as LTE gets deployed. how so exactly?? LTE is really just a 'last mile' tech... whether it's v4 or v6 doesnt' seem to matter (to the fact that it's LTE) > Another nit - They are also blocking Protocol41 on their EV-DO network. <cough>vzw not vzb</cough> > While this is a 'noble, if poorly thought out, effort' to prevent IPv6 from > impacting their cel phone users - it kind of messes up those of us who have > aircards (and got used to 6to4 for quick and dirty IPv6 connectivity). there are other carriers ya know?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |