[123617] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 enabled carriers?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cameron Byrne)
Thu Mar 11 21:52:51 2010
In-Reply-To: <75cb24521003111840n435e7fbbla1090299fb3330fe@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:52:28 -0800
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Christopher Morrow
<morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:25 PM, TJ <trejrco@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hmm, apologies - I was not explicit in calling out VZW; meant to, my bad and
>> thanks for pointing it out!
>
> yup, the core point I was trying to make was that LTE is really just a
> vzw network change, and has basically nothing to do with 'verizon'
> networks (19262 or 70X). in the end though, I'm sure they'll put v6 on
> it (lte)... eventually :)
>
IPv6 is mandatory on all VZW LTE devices, all SMS functions on VZW LTE
devices will be handled as IPv6. The device requirements are publicly
available.
> -Chris
>
>
