[123587] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 enabled carriers?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (TJ)
Thu Mar 11 12:55:10 2010
In-Reply-To: <9026A043-BBCD-4D97-853F-6749B86D33DB@semihuman.com>
From: TJ <trejrco@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:54:24 -0500
To: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: trejrco@gmail.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Chris Woodfield <rekoil@semihuman.com>wrote:
> To pile on in the spirit of "if people don't complain, nothing will change"
> - is VZB still insisting on filtering >/32 at their peers? While ARIN is
> allocating /40s and /48s directly?
>
I believe so ... will be even more impactful as LTE gets deployed.
Another nit - They are also blocking Protocol41 on their EV-DO network.
While this is a 'noble, if poorly thought out, effort' to prevent IPv6 from
impacting their cel phone users - it kind of messes up those of us who have
aircards (and got used to 6to4 for quick and dirty IPv6 connectivity).
/TJ
