[123582] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 enabled carriers?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Woodfield)
Thu Mar 11 12:03:23 2010
From: Chris Woodfield <rekoil@semihuman.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4B97F08B.2070500@rollernet.us>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:01:22 -0500
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
To pile on in the spirit of "if people don't complain, nothing will
change" - is VZB still insisting on filtering >/32 at their peers?
While ARIN is allocating /40s and /48s directly?
-C
On Mar 10, 2010, at 2:18 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 3/10/10 11:00 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
>> Does anyone have a list of carriers who are IPv6 capable today?
>>
>> I would assume this would be rolled out in larger cities first but
>> anything outside of "testbed environments" and "trials" as in
>> Comcast's recent announcement seems to be all that is available.
>>
>> I'm being tasked with coming up with an IPv6 migration plan for a
>> data center.
>>
>> Mostly interested in if ATT, Level3, GLBX, Saavis, Verizon Business
>> and Qwest are capable as those are the typical ones I deal with.
>>
>
> Ones I have personal experience with:
>
> GLBX - yes
> SAVVIS - no
> VZB - yes, good luck
> ATT - "Beginning in 1Q2010 MIS will provide the ability to support
> IPv6
> in a dual stack mode."
>
> When I disconnected my SAVVIS circuit in November 2009 I explicitly
> told
> them IPv6 was a deciding factor. Not all of Verizon's pops are IPv6
> enabled, which may cause you trouble ordering it. It's put me in month
> 11 of trying to turn up a dual-stack circuit because they refuse to
> read
> the order and keep putting it in Sacramento (v4 only) when it needs to
> go to San Jose (dual-stack). Sprint wasn't on your list, but they are
> rolling out native IPv6 support on all of 1239. I've been using their
> 6175 testbed since 2005.
>
> ~Seth
>
