[123443] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Best VPN Appliance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brandon Ewing)
Mon Mar 8 14:44:55 2010
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 13:42:34 -0600
From: Brandon Ewing <nicotine@warningg.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <C12D1AEEB369574CA5C2AD4A8412770A653281@dohmxtum33.doh.wa.lcl>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:37:02AM -0800, Blomberg, Orin P (DOH) wrote:
> There is also the fact to consider that Cisco has said there will be no
> support for Windows 64-bit on their IPSEC client, they are pushing
> people to the AnyConnect (An SSL-based clientless IPSEC) who want to use
> Windows 64-bit or other OSs, so in the future the argument for having a
> separate box for client-based IPSEC will be moot.
>=20
Cisco has released a beta version of their 64-bit IPSec client for Windows
7.
--=20
Brandon Ewing (nicotine@warningg.com)
--uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFLlVMq7UrjtO3ToYoRAhBmAJ9lNk/1PjyXjURBY0g1YDBP3fapBgCfYENG
PXvz6MAtuwVTOnXr8KJHors=
=kqEm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm--
