[123442] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Best VPN Appliance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael K. Smith - Adhost)
Mon Mar 8 14:43:07 2010
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 11:42:32 -0800
In-Reply-To: <C12D1AEEB369574CA5C2AD4A8412770A653281@dohmxtum33.doh.wa.lcl>
From: "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" <mksmith@adhost.com>
To: "Blomberg, Orin P (DOH)" <Orin.Blomberg@DOH.WA.GOV>,
<sfouant@shortestpathfirst.net>, "Voll, Toivo" <toivo@usf.edu>,
"Chris Campbell" <Chris.Campbell@nebulassolutions.com>,
"Dawood Iqbal" <Dawood_Iqbal@hotmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Blomberg, Orin P (DOH) [mailto:Orin.Blomberg@DOH.WA.GOV]
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:37 AM
> To: sfouant@shortestpathfirst.net; Voll, Toivo; Chris Campbell; Dawood
> Iqbal
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: RE: Best VPN Appliance
>=20
> There is also the fact to consider that Cisco has said there will be
no
> support for Windows 64-bit on their IPSEC client, they are pushing
> people to the AnyConnect (An SSL-based clientless IPSEC) who want to
> use
> Windows 64-bit or other OSs, so in the future the argument for having
a
> separate box for client-based IPSEC will be moot.
>=20
The beta 64-bit VPN client has been released, FYI.
Mike
