[123329] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP4 Space - the lie
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Fri Mar 5 10:02:27 2010
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:01:56 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: Dan White <dwhite@olp.net>
In-Reply-To: <20100305144019.GA4695@dan.olp.net>
Cc: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:40:19AM -0600, Dan White wrote:
> On 05/03/10 12:39 +0000, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> > er... what part of dual-stack didn't you understand?
> > dual-stack consumes exactly the same number of v4 and v6 addresses.
>
> I would expect the number of v6 addresses assigned to a host to be a
> multiple of the number of v4 addresses, depending on the type of host.
true that... i was being - perhaps - too literal.
> > imho - the path through the woods is an IVI-like solution.
>
> Or, dual stack today. When you've run out of IPv4 addresses for new end
> users, set them up an IPv6 HTTP proxy, SMTP relay and DNS resolver and/or
> charge a premium for IPv4 addresses when you start to sweat.
>
and then we are back to drc's comments.
> --
> Dan White
