[123019] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (gordon b slater)
Fri Feb 26 13:22:51 2010
X-IP-MAIL-FROM: gordslater@ieee.org
From: gordon b slater <gordslater@ieee.org>
To: Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net>
In-Reply-To: <20100226170924.99ADB1CC0E@ptavv.es.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:22:10 +0000
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: gordslater@ieee.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 09:09 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Oh, and X.25 and X.509 are from an older organization that merged into
> the ITU-T when it was created, the CCITT (International Telegraph
> and Telephone Consultative Committee). It became the ITU-T in 1992.
Yeah, CCITT - thanks for the jog - your memory is better than mine, I
was too busy `networking` on a straight hand key and cans in `92. All
valves (tubes) and sparks tracking over the damp egg insulators :)
I must admit to total confusion over why they need to "grab" IPs from
the v6 address space? Surely they don't need the equivalent of
band-plans for IP space? Or have I missed some v6 technical point
totally?
Gord
K
