[123008] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (gordon b slater)
Fri Feb 26 11:52:55 2010
X-IP-MAIL-FROM: gordslater@ieee.org
From: gordon b slater <gordslater@ieee.org>
To: Jorge Amodio <jmamodio@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <202705b1002260740t3252c74en31353af3d67cb72b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:52:21 +0000
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: gordslater@ieee.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 09:40 -0600, Jorge Amodio wrote:
> I guess nobody needs ITU-T anymore, or do we ?
ZCZC
well, from vague memory, H.264, G711/729, H323, X.509 were/are ITU-T
standards - maybe X.25 too though I could have that one wrong.
I'll just sit on the fence: as an old radiocomms guy, I'd say ITU-_R_ is
still very relevant if you guys DON'T want to watch/listen N. Korean or
Bangladeshi TV/radio on your home Sat systems or car radios, to name a
couple of recently quoted countries :)
But ITU-T? That's one for the VoIP guys to shout about.
de Gord
NNNN
