[122863] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Email Portability Approved by Knesset Committee
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hank Nussbacher)
Mon Feb 22 15:04:12 2010
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:03:40 +0200 (IST)
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@efes.iucc.ac.il>
To: Dorn Hetzel <dhetzel@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7db2dcf91002220826q72daa2bj1d83c73274f15ab2@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG Operators Group <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, Dorn Hetzel wrote:
> I am sure the various carriers faced with the onset of Local Number
> Portability and WLNP in this part of the world would have been happy to
> escape with only forwarding phone calls for 3 months.
>
> Alas, such was not their fate :)
>
> I would watch out for this idea, it might actually catch on in various
> places, warts and all...
Can IP number portability be far behind? You think your routing tables
are big now?! Wait till you are mandated to carry /32s for IP number
portability :-)
-Hank
