[122862] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Spamhaus...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Feb 22 14:46:47 2010
To: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:57:31 GMT."
<g3pr3y4ox0.fsf@nsa.vix.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:45:35 -0500
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1266867935_3990P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:57:31 GMT, Paul Vixie said:
> Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> writes:
> > We're well past that. Every minimally-competent postmaster on this
> > planet knows that clause became operationally obsolete years ago [1], and
> > has configured their mail systems to always reject, never bounce. [2]
>
> for smtp, i agree. yet, uucp and other non-smtp last miles are not dead.
In exactly the same sense, and for the same reasons, that 36-bit machines
are not dead yet.
--==_Exmh_1266867935_3990P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFLgt7fcC3lWbTT17ARAtvnAJ0THEMDoKmzOt/LuXuoqxR2wNZzUQCgh/UO
0tcUXxi8nZoqer/h+bnwrQM=
=se6F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1266867935_3990P--
