[122832] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Email Portability Approved by Knesset Committee
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mustafa Golam -)
Mon Feb 22 12:22:28 2010
In-Reply-To: <4B82B5B7.2010406@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:22:01 +0600
From: Mustafa Golam - <mustafa.golam@gmail.com>
To: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon@cox.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: mustafa.golam@gmail.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon@cox.net>wrote:
>
> An email address that ends in example.com irrevocably ties the address
> user to the company Example and may in fact be affirmatively harmful
> beyond the technical difficulty of implementation.
>
> IMHO, ISPs would be forged to take Google's policy of Email addresses.
xyz@gmail.com for beta-users, like you and me; while xyz@google.com for
employees. But surely it will create technical implication along with many
others.
--
Mustafa
