[122767] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: "Cyber Shockwave" on CNN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tomas L. Byrnes)
Sat Feb 20 22:49:57 2010
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:49:25 -0800
In-Reply-To: <862133.58195.qm@web59616.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
From: "Tomas L. Byrnes" <tomb@byrneit.net>
To: "andrew.wallace" <andrew.wallace@rocketmail.com>,
"Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Right, because GCHQ doesn't/hasn't/never would do such a thing...
At least the US has a written constitution and the concept of the people =
being sovereign.
I'll take that over trusting "Her Majesty's..." whatever.
But then again, I'm Irish, so I have a bit more direct personal and =
familial experience of the darker side of British "civilization". (EG: =
While detention without trial is relatively NEW in the US, it's been a =
fact of life in the UK for most of its history).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: andrew.wallace [mailto:andrew.wallace@rocketmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 2:13 PM
> To: Randy Bush
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: "Cyber Shockwave" on CNN
>=20
> --- On Sat, 20/2/10, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>=20
> > From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
> > Subject: Re: "Cyber Shockwave" on CNN
> > To: "andrew.wallace" <andrew.wallace@rocketmail.com>
> > Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> > Date: Saturday, 20 February, 2010, 21:58
> > > It looks like this demo is
> >
> > a bunch of sick press and sick ex-gov wishtheycouldbeagains
> > trying to
> > get as much mindshare as they can.=A0 and you're helping
> > them.
> >
> > randy
> >
>=20
> I refuse to let you say I am helping them -- I am from UK, I don't
> agree with them wanting to allow The NSA to take over private sector
> networks or citizens smart phones 'in an emergency'.
>=20
> Andrew
>=20
>=20
>=20
