[122740] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: "Cyber Shockwave" on CNN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (andrew.wallace)
Sat Feb 20 16:54:10 2010
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:52:11 -0800 (PST)
From: "andrew.wallace" <andrew.wallace@rocketmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2ocjk4n76.wl%randy@psg.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--- On Sat, 20/2/10, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:=0A=0A> From: Randy B=
ush <randy@psg.com>=0A> Subject: Re: "Cyber Shockwave" on CNN=0A> To: "andr=
ew.wallace" <andrew.wallace@rocketmail.com>=0A> Cc: nanog@nanog.org=0A> Dat=
e: Saturday, 20 February, 2010, 3:10=0A> the details were in the press days=
=0A> ago.=A0 83.2% scare, negligible lessons=0A> we can actually put in pra=
ctice without becoming (more of)=0A> a police=0A> state.=0A> =0A> randy=0A>=
=0A=0AIt looks like this demo is pressing ahead for the intro of allowing =
the US Government to take control of private sector networks "in an emergen=
cy"... and wants to include smart phones into the bargin.=0A=0AOr at least =
that is my interpretation of what the demo is trying to convince us on.=0A=
=0ACyber Shockwave Reveals Unsettling Answers ---=0A=0Ahttp://www.mi2g.com/=
cgi/mi2g/frameset.php?pageid=3Dhttp%3A//www.mi2g.com/cgi/mi2g/press/180210.=
php=0A=0AAndrew=0A=0A=0A
