[122034] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: How polluted is 1/8?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Thu Feb 4 14:32:34 2010
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <4B6B1178.30107@kl.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:30:31 -0500
To: Kevin Loch <kloch@kl.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Feb 4, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Kevin Loch wrote:
> Mirjam Kuehne wrote:
>> Hello,
>> After 1/8 was allocated to APNIC last week, the RIPE NCC did some =
measurements to find out how "polluted" this block really is.
>> See some surprising results on RIPE Labs: =
http://labs.ripe.net/content/pollution-18
>> Please also note the call for feedback at the bottom of the article.
>=20
> The most surprising thing in that report was that someone has an =
AMS-IX
> port at just 10 megs. It would be nice to see an actual measurement =
of
> the traffic and daily/weekly changes. A breakdown of the flow data by
> source ASN and source prefix (for the top 50-100 sources) would also =
be
> interesting.
There was a call on the apnic list for someone to sink some of the =
traffic.
I'd like to see someone capture the data and post pcaps/netflow =
analysis, and possibly just run a http server on that /24 so people can =
test if their network is broken.
I've taken a peek at the traffic, and I don't think it's 100's of megs, =
but without a global view who knows.
- Jared=
