[122012] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: How polluted is 1/8?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathan Ward)
Wed Feb 3 17:48:33 2010
From: Nathan Ward <nanog@daork.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1002031512540.2094@whammy.cluebyfour.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 11:47:53 +1300
To: nanOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 4/02/2010, at 9:19 AM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
> I would hope that the APNIC would opt not to assign networks that =
would contain 1.1.1.1 or 1.2.3.4 to customers for exactly that reason. =
The signal-to-noise ratio for those addresses is likely pretty high. =
The noise is likely contained on many internal networks for now because =
a corresponding route doesn't show up in the global routing table at the =
moment. Once that changes....
1.1.1/24 and 1.2.3/24 are assigned to APNIC. Unless they release them, =
the general public will not get addresses in these.
--
Nathan Ward=
