[121992] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: How polluted is 1/8?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Bicknell)
Wed Feb 3 11:12:49 2010
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:12:00 -0800
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4B699AEC.8080505@ripe.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message written on Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 04:49:00PM +0100, Mirjam Kuehn=
e wrote:
> After 1/8 was allocated to APNIC last week, the RIPE NCC did some=20
> measurements to find out how "polluted" this block really is.
Having this data is useful, but I can't help to think it would be
more useful if it were compared with 27/8, or other networks. Is
this slightly worse, or significantly worse than other networks?
--=20
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD)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=Ijf2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L--
