[121861] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: DDoS mitigation recommendations

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Thu Jan 28 21:24:06 2010

In-Reply-To: <010201caa089$e1100e50$a3302af0$@net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:23:53 -0500
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Fouant <sfouant@shortestpathfirst.net>
Cc: Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon@blacklotus.net>, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Stefan Fouant
<sfouant@shortestpathfirst.net> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:morrowc.lists@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:56 AM
>> To: Jeffrey Lyon
>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: DDoS mitigation recommendations
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Jeffrey Lyon
>> <jeffrey.lyon@blacklotus.net> wrote:
>> > IntruGuard is highly customizable both from the GUI and CLI with the
>> > engineer's assistance. Its the highest performance, reasonably priced
>> box
>> > that we've tried so far.
>>
>> 'highest performance' == 100mbps on a 1gbps copper interface? or
>> sessions setup/second? or remote-addresses tracked? or ?
>
> sessions setup/second = ddos mitigation fail ;)

'unqualified adjectives == fail' ... or 'lies, damned lines and
statistics' or 'pls to be qualifying your statement with some useful
data'

:)
-chris


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post