|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:01:15 -0600 From: Tom Sands <tsands@rackspace.com> CC: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org> In-Reply-To: <49EBDFF3A3469A47BBA7B1B537A4729A17D66FC4F5@PRVPEXVS11.corp.twcable.com> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org > -----Original Message----- > From: David Freedman [mailto:david.freedman@uk.clara.net] > Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 8:17 AM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: DDoS mitigation recommendations > >> Arbor stuff comes to mind and works very well in our experiences.... > > Arbor++ > > We've already done an initial trial with the Arbor device, and it does work well. Our biggest sticking point with it is that it lacks the granular level of visibility and control that we've been used to and often needed to tweak profiles. Basically, it does what it's supposed to well, but you really can't tell what that is, and if it's not catching all of a DDoS you have little insight as to what's being missed or control to correct it. Thank you, Tom Sands Chief Network Engineer Rackspace Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message (including any attached or embedded documents) is intended for the exclusive and confidential use of the individual or entity to which this message is addressed, and unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged information of Rackspace. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of the enclosed material is prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at abuse@rackspace.com, and delete the original message. Your cooperation is appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |