[120646] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ip-precedence for management traffic
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andy Davidson)
Wed Dec 30 02:55:31 2009
From: Andy Davidson <andy@nosignal.org>
In-Reply-To: <08EF11E7-090F-494B-8083-52D30D8DD9E5@puck.nether.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:54:16 +0000
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 29 Dec 2009, at 17:19, Jared Mauch wrote:
> I've watched BCPs be diluted at various companies due to market =
pressures. $major_provider did not require me to register my routes, =
why should I have to do that in order to give you $X MRC for the next =
12-24-36 months?
[...]
> Honestly, I wish we could have a "better" network. One where we have =
mutually agreed "I will filter my customers if you do".
You can (should) still filter their prefixes - the customer get added =
pain because changes have to be done by hand, through tickets, maybe as =
a billable incident. :-)
Andy
