[120613] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ip-precedence for management traffic
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Julio Arruda)
Tue Dec 29 09:10:08 2009
From: Julio Arruda <jarruda-gter@jarruda.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C939B99-2BC9-4A54-99B2-467B20841FB6@akcin.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 09:09:19 -0500
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jarruda-gter@jarruda.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
One note on this :-)..
Some time ago, a friend of mine worked in a carrier that had dialup =
modems for out-of-band access ('lights-out, end-of-world' recovery)
They kept the practice in a new NGN Class4/5 replacement..
Detail, the dial-up line went over the NGN..............
On Dec 29, 2009, at 6:03 AM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
>=20
> On Dec 29, 2009, at 2:07 AM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
>=20
>>=20
>> On Dec 29, 2009, at 6:02 PM, Luca Tosolini wrote:
>>=20
>>> this leaves out only ipp 7 for management traffic, on the premise =
that routing and management should not share the same queue and =
resources.....
>>=20
>> Management-plane traffic should be sent/received via your DCN/OOB =
network, so that it's not competing with customer traffic nor subject to =
network partitions or other disruptive events. It should not be =
co-mingled with traffic on the production network.
>=20
> Agreed, it's very important to have a management network that is =
reachable while you are under ddos or some kind of mess you or someone =
else've created. Often having something like an ADSL like connection =
will save trips to colo and will give you nice abilities to work on =
stuff when combined with serial management tools.
>=20
> Mehmet
