[120522] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: IGMP and PIM protection
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stefan Fouant)
Wed Dec 23 10:25:50 2009
From: "Stefan Fouant" <sfouant@shortestpathfirst.net>
To: <swm@emanon.com>,
"'Glen Kent'" <glen.kent@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B3228A4.4020505@emanon.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:24:59 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Morris [mailto:swm@emanon.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 9:27 AM
> To: Glen Kent
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: IGMP and PIM protection
>
> But IGMP IS the control traffic with users. And PIM IS the control
> traffic between multicast routers.
I think OP meant that he only wants an integrity check of the control
traffic, not confidentiality, hence the statement that he does not want to
encrypt the control traffic.
Stefan Fouant
www.shortestpathfirst.net
GPG Key ID: 0xB5E3803D
