[120521] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IGMP and PIM protection
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Morris)
Wed Dec 23 09:30:27 2009
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:26:44 -0500
From: Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com>
To: Glen Kent <glen.kent@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <92c950310912230619i6e9f71fchd42867cae5774571@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: swm@emanon.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
But IGMP IS the control traffic with users. And PIM IS the control
traffic between multicast routers.
?
Scott
Glen Kent wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Dobbins, Roland <rdobbins@arbor.net> wrote:
>
>> On Dec 23, 2009, at 6:41 PM, Glen Kent wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Any idea if folks use AH or ESP to protect IGMP/PIM packets
>>>
>> What are you trying to 'protect' them against?
>>
>
> Just integrity protection to ensure that my reports, etc. are not
> mangled when i recv them. OR to make sure that i only receive
> reports/leaves from the folks who are supposed to send them.
>
> Please note that i am NOT interested in encrypting the control traffic.
>
> Kent
>
>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
>>
>> Injustice is relatively easy to bear; what stings is justice.
>>
>> -- H.L. Mencken
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>