[120329] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Niels Bakker)
Wed Dec 16 12:46:36 2009
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:45:50 +0100
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog@bakker.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4B290D7F.5090008@sorbs.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
* matthew@sorbs.net (Michelle Sullivan) [Wed 16 Dec 2009, 17:41 CET]:
[..]
>..... The obvious answer is if you have signed SLAs then you should
>adhere to those SLAs as a minimum and give better service if time
>allows... Hands up those who have an SLA (free or not) with an RBL
>maintainer... I don't expect to see any hands...
How much would you charge a company for it to get taken off immediately
after it hits your list?
-- Niels.
