[120327] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jack Bates)
Wed Dec 16 12:28:57 2009
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:26:07 -0600
From: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
To: Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com>
In-Reply-To: <63ac96a50912160921j73d81f88n32f3500c7da7945e@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Matthew Petach wrote:
> Take a look at the reverse DNS for the entire 66.163.178.0/23 subnet;
> you'll find that when you're doing things at large scale, you can't really
> get away from having sequentially numbered reverse DNS entries all
> in a row, exactly as you seem to think "Nobody has". :/
>
Of course not. Everyone is small like me. Having more than 10 mail
servers? How dare you use incremental numbers on such a large scale!
Jack
