[120211] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is there anyone from ASPEWS on this list?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Peach)
Fri Dec 11 21:52:56 2009
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:51:31 -0500
From: John Peach <john-nanog@johnpeach.com>
In-reply-to: <4B230483.8070700@rollernet.us>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:48:35 -0800
Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us> wrote:
> William Pitcock wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 23:39 +0000, John Levine wrote:
> >>> ASPEWS is listing 216.83.32.0/20 as being associated with the whole
> >>> Atrivo incident of 2008. My memory does not recall 216.83.32.0/20 being
> >>> involved, nor the provider that belongs to.
> >> Since nobody but the occasional highly vocal GWL uses ASPEWS, it's
> >> hard to see why one would care, but if you want to find ASPEWS, crank
> >> up your favorite usenet program, post a question to nanae, and watch
> >> the vitriol roll in. There might be a comment from ASPEWS in there.
> >
> > Well, I just want to reach SORBS to clear up some confusion regarding
> > what ranges of mine are dynamic (e.g. none of them, but they seem to
> > think otherwise). Unfortunately, e-mail to SORBS bounces due to
> > ethr.net being listed in ASPEWS as being "part of Atrivo".
> >
>
> You should still be able to submit a ticket to SORBS, no? I was always
> under the impression that it was "open a ticket and wait or you are
> moved to the back of the line" with SORBS.
>
More like "pay our ransom or FOAD". Why I never use them....
--
John
