[120210] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is there anyone from ASPEWS on this list?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Seth Mattinen)
Fri Dec 11 21:48:41 2009
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:48:35 -0800
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <1260582204.4148.130.camel@petrie>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
William Pitcock wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 23:39 +0000, John Levine wrote:
>>> ASPEWS is listing 216.83.32.0/20 as being associated with the whole
>>> Atrivo incident of 2008. My memory does not recall 216.83.32.0/20 being
>>> involved, nor the provider that belongs to.
>> Since nobody but the occasional highly vocal GWL uses ASPEWS, it's
>> hard to see why one would care, but if you want to find ASPEWS, crank
>> up your favorite usenet program, post a question to nanae, and watch
>> the vitriol roll in. There might be a comment from ASPEWS in there.
>
> Well, I just want to reach SORBS to clear up some confusion regarding
> what ranges of mine are dynamic (e.g. none of them, but they seem to
> think otherwise). Unfortunately, e-mail to SORBS bounces due to
> ethr.net being listed in ASPEWS as being "part of Atrivo".
>
You should still be able to submit a ticket to SORBS, no? I was always
under the impression that it was "open a ticket and wait or you are
moved to the back of the line" with SORBS.
~Seth
