[119782] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: FTTH Active vs Passive
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Tue Dec 1 18:12:16 2009
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:11:23 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
In-Reply-To: <20091201201503.GC1158@vacation.karoshi.com.>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> actually, the killer here is PMTU... there is almost no way to
> effectively utilize the BW when the MTU is locked to 1500 bytes.
and the reality, e.g. ntt b-flets, is often pppoe v4-only, which is
lower.
randy