[119781] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: FTTH Active vs Passive
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Tue Dec 1 17:37:49 2009
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <620fd17c0912011133r13a993eer72e3da41e8e529f9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 17:36:51 -0500
To: Paul Wall <pauldotwall@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Dec 1, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Paul Wall wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Dan White <dwhite@olp.net> wrote:
>> All valid points. Deploying a strand to each customer from the =
CO/Cabinet
>> is a good way to future proof your plant.
>=20
> I would argue that every customer is entitled to duplex fiber.
I'll settle with fiber within 2km of my home right now.
If people have recommendations for FTTH/GPON/Whatnot let me know.
Right now, I'm thinking stuff like this is cool:
http://www.provantage.com/zyxel-mc1000sfp~7ZYXS00C.htm
I suspect one could do interesting things with BX10/LX10 SFPs. (Likely =
not with cisco though).
- Jared=
