[119385] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paolo Lucente)
Tue Nov 17 11:11:10 2009
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:10:29 +0000
From: Paolo Lucente <pl+list@pmacct.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20091117002806.GA302@srv03.cluenet.de>
Reply-To: Paolo Lucente <pl+list@pmacct.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:28:06AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> Caveat: no MAC accounting on LAGs (IEEE speak) / Aggregated Ethernet (Juniper
> speak) / Etherchannels (Cisco speak).
>
> Might or might not be important when using bundled links to public
> peering fabrics.
Or for the very same goal, vendors can maybe think at making support
for L2 primitives via NetFlow v9 exports somewhat more implemented.
Cheers,
Paolo
