[119383] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jack Bates)
Tue Nov 17 10:28:15 2009
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:24:24 -0600
From: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
To: Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net>
In-Reply-To: <20091117044624.GB51443@gerbil.cluepon.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> They've definitely been improving it over the years though, so much that
> I almost never trigger a session reset on me unintentionally any more.
They must have. This was new to me and came as a shock. I don't think
I've ever seen my m120 behave any different than my cisco when it comes
to flapping BGP. Things have just worked as I expected them to. Not that
I go screwing with underlying interface configs or changing a peer from
one group to another or changing the asn; at least not on a live
session. These things would seem to indicate that the session might be
subject to reset.
Perhaps it just behaves for normal users and not power users. :)
Jack
