[119304] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?=A3ukasz_Bromirski?)
Thu Nov 12 18:46:45 2009
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:45:48 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?=A3ukasz_Bromirski?= <lukasz@bromirski.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4AFC8014.3010407@davidcoulson.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 2009-11-12 22:37, David Coulson wrote:
> The MX-series are pretty nice. That should be able to do VPLS PE,
> however I've never tried it - MX240 did it pretty well last time I
> tried. I've no clue how the cost of that switch compares to a cisco 490=
0
> or something (not that a 4900 is anything special - L3 is all in softwa=
re).
For both 4948/4948-10GE and 4900M L3 is in hardware. For
4948/4948-10GE IPv6 is in software, for 4900M it's in hardware.
--=20
"Everything will be okay in the end. | =A3ukasz Bromirsk=
i
If it's not okay, it's not the end. | http://lukasz.bromirski.net
