[119303] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (George Bonser)
Thu Nov 12 17:49:16 2009
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:48:38 -0800
In-Reply-To: <4AFC7969.7050006@hosteurope.de>
From: "George Bonser" <gbonser@seven.com>
To: <mvh@hosteurope.de>,
"Raj Singh" <raj.singh@demandmedia.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I believe TRILL will render this discussion moot. It should be shipping
on gear from various vendors within the next year.
-----Original Message-----
From: Malte von dem Hagen [mailto:mvh@hosteurope.de]=20
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 1:09 PM
To: Raj Singh
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR
Hej,
Am 12.11.2009 21:04 Uhr schrieb Raj Singh:
> We are actually looking at going Layer 3 all the way to the top of=20
> rack and make each rack its own /24.
what a waste of IPs and unnecessary loss of flexibility!
