[118451] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Karl Auer)
Thu Oct 22 06:21:14 2009

From: Karl Auer <kauer@biplane.com.au>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <923D6971-6DEB-4EAE-AB37-8B69FB9A787B@muada.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:20:11 +1100
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org


--=-bmE3Ofr9njITed9CxJU7
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 11:40 +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> If, on the other hand, the REAL desire is to have a DHCP server break =20
> the tie in the selection between several routers that advertise their =20
> presence, that wouldn't be unreasonable.

The RA contains a preference level... maybe that doesn't cut it if
multiple routers are sending the same preference level, but presumably
that would not happen in a well-tended network.

In any case, anywhere this is actually of vital importance, a routing
protocol would be in use.

Using the DHCP protocol to deliver information - about anything really -
is what it's *for*. That said, making clients depend utterly on the
presence of a working DHCP server for basic connectivity seems like a
backward step. Of course, different people have different ideas about
what constitutes "basic" connectivity.

> Stop trying to break the internet and I'll treat you like an adult.

Whoa! Tell you what, how about if I break it, and you get to choose
which piece you keep? [Bash, bash, thud. Ugh. Hm. It's tougher than it
looks!]

:-)

Regards, K.

--=20
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer@biplane.com.au)                   +61-2-64957160 (h)
http://www.biplane.com.au/~kauer/                  +61-428-957160 (mob)

GPG fingerprint: 07F3 1DF9 9D45 8BCD 7DD5 00CE 4A44 6A03 F43A 7DEF


--=-bmE3Ofr9njITed9CxJU7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkrgMIYACgkQSkRqA/Q6fe9mPQCg3F/BhtMtn/fTcM60kfLKGOv5
8ygAnRHKEC1RFejrdLycYnipQu0yEhBl
=P6LL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-bmE3Ofr9njITed9CxJU7--



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post