[118403] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
Wed Oct 21 15:43:56 2009
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
To: Karl Auer <kauer@biplane.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <1255837860.18603.1008.camel@karl>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:42:43 +0200
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 18 okt 2009, at 5:51, Karl Auer wrote:
> Do the advertisements "right", advise sysadmins that hosts should
> not do
> SLAAC,
Doesn't it tell you something that you're fighting this hard to avoid
hosts from doing what comes naturally?
It occurs to me that I haven't met anyone who uses the term "SLAAC"
who uses IPv6 in a way that I would consider normal. (Or at all.)
