[118420] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Barak)
Wed Oct 21 17:03:11 2009
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Barak <thegameiam@yahoo.com>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <C76DC86F-2584-44E9-8D8B-1859FE4779EF@muada.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
----- Original Message ----=0A>From: Iljitsch van Beijnum iljitsch@muada.co=
m=0A>Then again, if we remove all the improvements from IPv6 what's the poi=
nt of adopting it?=0A=0AHow about=A0"IPv4 address depletion?"=0A=0AI'm perf=
ectly happy with how my network works.=A0 I do, however, want it to keep gr=
owing, and this requires more addresses.=A0=A0=0A=0AThe requirement for org=
anizations with thousands (or in some cases millions)=A0of deployed custome=
rs to dramatically change how they can associate an IP address with custome=
r ports (or provide remote configuration of said customers' devices) is not=
an attractive feature.=0A=0ADavid Barak=0ANeed Geek Rock? Try The Franchis=
e: =0Ahttp://www.listentothefranchise.com=0A=0A=0A
